2. It is recognized that the circumstances such as the fact that the defendant needs the length of his hand because he has a mental disorder on the board, the fact that the defendant seems to be unable to repay his money to the victim because he was damaged by the public prosecution and other F, and that the defendant is divided into his mistake.

However, considering the circumstances such as the fact that the Defendant, by actively deceiving the victim and repeatedly defrauded the money several times, the nature of the crime is not good, the damage recovery or agreement has not been reached against the victim even though the amount of damage is not significant, and the fact that there are many criminal records of the same kind of crime against the defendant, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the lower court against the defendant is too unreasonable in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the circumstances and methods of the crime, the age, character and conduct, home environment of the defendant, and the circumstances after the crime.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.