However, each of the above two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive is against the Defendants.

On June 7, 2014, around 01:30 on June 7, 2014, the Defendants found that G Costaex vehicle owned by the victim F was parked without being fastened, and entered the above vehicle with one black box in the market price.

In this way, the Defendants jointly stolen the property owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A written statement;

1. A report on the results of field identification;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to verify identity of thief fingerprints;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 331(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants subject to discretionary mitigation: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants on probation: The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act / [type of crime ] 2 of the thief for general larceny (special person / mitigated elements / [Scope of field and recommendation] mitigation elements / [Scope of punishment] basic area of imprisonment / imprisonment 6 months (minimum limit of punishment for law) or 10 months (general person / two or more persons] aggravation factors of imprisonment / [decision of sentence] 2 years of suspended sentence for six months - both the above sentencing factors and the defendants recognize their mistakes - The above sentencing factors and the defendants recognize their mistakes - the amount of damage minor, and there are no particular criminal records in Korea.