However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On August 10, 2019, around 19:50, the Defendant: (a) went to the “D” used by the victim C in Mayang-gu B for his residence and occupation house; (b) was under the influence of alcohol; (c) was under the influence of alcohol; (d) was under the influence of alcohol; and (d) was into the victim’s residence.

2. On the same day at around 20:20 of the foregoing day, the Defendant committed an assault, such as: (a) at the same place; (b) at the Annyang Police Station E Zone 2, which received a report and called, “Cmp, inside, murdered; (c) bitch son; (d) bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch; (e) bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch; and (e) f, f’s left-hand chest, f’s face.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of C’s written statements, written statements, and statutes;

1. Relevant Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for the crime

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, including the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim of the crime of intrusion upon residence, and other various conditions of sentencing, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, background of the crime and circumstances before and after the crime, shall be determined as the sentence