beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.09.19 2019나51053

보험금

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs falling under the following order of payment shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for this part of the reasoning is the same as that for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part of the reasoning is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Determination

A. Since the instant accident, which caused the liability to pay the mutual aid benefits, constitutes a school safety accident as stipulated in the School Safety Act, there is no dispute between the parties, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiffs the mutual aid benefits as stipulated in the School Safety Act for the damage caused by the instant accident.

B. Personal information 1) 1) Scope of the liability for the payment of disability benefits: Lborn, male b) income and operation period: The Plaintiff’s age (the age of 19) as sought by the Plaintiff, and the labor disability loss rate is equivalent to the daily wage of an ordinary worker in an urban area from July 19, 2020 to the age of 60, which is after the date scheduled to terminate the military service period: 15% of the Act on the Safety of Schools (Article 37(2) of the Act on the Safety of Schools provides that matters necessary for the criteria for the degree of disability, calculation of the degree of disability benefits and the method for payment thereof shall be prescribed by the Presidential Decree, and Article 16(1) of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act provides that the degree of physical disability and the rate of the loss of labor ability shall be based on [Attachment Table 2].

According to the result of the physical examination entrustment to the K Hospital Head of the court of first instance, it is recognized that the Plaintiff’s self-conceptic symptoms of the Plaintiff A "maekne's pain and unstable," and that the Plaintiff’s labor ability loss rate is 15%, since it constitutes “the person who has left for the function of one of the three major sections of the three major sections of one bridge,” under subparagraph 7 of Article 16(1) of the Enforcement Decree of the School Safety Act, it is recognized that the Plaintiff’s scopic symptoms of the other scopic symptoms have measured the 7.8m high right, the result of the stress test, the result of the stress radiation test, and the left 0m right 0m high right - right - the left - the 7.8m high right - the right - the left - the right --

In this regard, the defendant's loss rate of labor ability of the plaintiff A is based on the criteria for the judgment of disability of J. J.