2. In light of the circumstances leading up to the crime of this case, etc., the crime of this case is not less complicated; the defendant did not agree with the victims; there is no special change in circumstances that could change the punishment of the court below after the decision of the court below was made; and other various sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, such as the character, conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant, the court below’s punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure; “The pertinent Article of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. and Selection of Punishment” in the application of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. shall be deemed as “the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. (wholly amended by Act No. 13718, Jan. 6, 2016).”