The sentencing of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

In light of the following circumstances, the Defendant committed the instant crime while making a confession of all the instant crimes, and the fact that the amount of each of the instant damages is not relatively large, etc., the Defendant paid the amount of damage to the Defendant favorable to the Defendant, or did not reach an agreement with the victims, and the Defendant was subject to criminal punishment on a total of two occasions including the one-time period of punishment for the same crime. In particular, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year, who was sentenced to a two-year period of suspension of execution, and was sentenced to a one-year term of suspension of execution, and committed the instant crime during the period of suspension of execution, and was sentenced to a one-year term of suspension of execution, and was serving as a repeated offender. The Defendant committed the instant crime, such as fraud, theft, etc., for a relatively short period, taking into account the motive and background leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances after the commission of the instant crime, Defendant’s age, character and behavior, and environment, etc., the sentencing of the lower court is too unreasonable.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition