beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2014.06.19 2014고정95

상해

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a sales salesperson of "C Company", D and E are women, and the Defendant, at around 10:30 on July 4, 2013, 'C Company' in "C Company F in Ansan City F, requiring approximately three weeks of medical treatment by putting the head cry of the victim D and destroying the head cry in excess of the upper part of the head cry, and continued to put the cryle of the victim E, one time of the shoulder of the victim E, one time of the cryle of the cryp and the cryp of the cryp and the cryp of the wall that require two weeks of medical treatment at the same time.

2. As evidence that conforms to the Defendant’s harmful act, such as the facts charged, that D and E suffered injury by the Defendant’s harmful act, there is a result of the statement made by investigative agencies and this Court and the fact-finding on each of the injury diagnosis documents, and the medical corporations of this Court.

However, the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the records of this case, such as the video recording and recording of cell phones at the scene of crime, the witness H and I's legal statement, i.e., the defendant filed a report with H, D and E on the ground that H were found and assaulted by H and E, ② D and E continued to show that they did not have any criminal defendant even after the police officer was dispatched to Dong N and Dong, and it was difficult to avoid humiliation and disturbance. On the spot, the police officer called to the scene because they did not claim that they were assaulted by the defendant, and the police officer called to the scene was found to be violence only D and E as the crime of each assault; ③ The police officer returned to the scene by G Hospital after being treated by the police officer, and received treatment at the G Hospital on July 16, 2013, and received treatment from three women at the location of the defendant's office, and the suspect interrogation report and the suspect interrogation report were submitted to C and the suspect interrogation report on the defendant's cell phone to the defendant.