2. In full view of all the circumstances that are favorable to the defendant, including the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant could have been judged simultaneously with the crime of this case, the amount of profit that the defendant acquired by the crime of this case could not reach the amount of fraud as indicated in the judgment, and the fact that there is a family member to support the defendant. However, even though a considerable period after the crime of this case has elapsed, there is no change in circumstances or circumstances that can be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the judgment below, there is no change in special circumstances or circumstances that are considered newly after the sentence of the judgment below, and there is no other changes in the defendant's character and behavior, environment, relationship with the victim, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and all other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the arguments and the records of this case,

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.