2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The status of the parties to the case is the seller of the non-cheon-si AV apartment (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”), the defendant gold Industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Gold Industry”) is the contractor of the apartment of this case. The plaintiffs are the buyer or buyer of the apartment of this case from the buyer or buyer of the apartment of this case.

B. 1) The rest of the Plaintiffs except Plaintiff N, W, and AD entered into a sales contract with Defendant AY on the relevant date indicated in the “sale date” column in the attached Table 2, and each of them entered into a sales contract with Defendant B’s purchase price indicated in the “sale price” column in the same table in the same table. 2) Plaintiff N purchased KRW 3704, 693,000,000, the purchase price for the instant apartment from Defendant AW, who was the buyer on September 17, 2013, for KRW 693,00,000, and Plaintiff B purchased KRW 4602, the purchase price for the instant apartment from the buyer on July 9, 2013, KRW 740,000,000, the purchase price for the instant apartment from Plaintiff AY, who was the buyer on a joint basis with AX, for KRW 4602,00,000, the purchase price for the instant apartment from Plaintiff AD’s purchase price for KRW 3000,300,2.

C. On January 30, 2012, the approval for the use of the instant apartment and the preparation of a written agreement for the delay of occupancy was granted, and the Defendant’s transfer system publicly announced the buyers to move into the instant apartment from January 31, 2012 to March 31, 2012. However, there were a large number of households to move into the instant apartment. (ii) Defendant’s transfer system was conducted with some buyers around April 2012 for the prompt occupancy of the buyers.