(2) Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act of the same Act applicable mutatis mutandis to the case (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 89Meu4045, Jul. 25, 1989). (2) Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) of the same Act only stipulate that a written objection filed by the defendant while filing an objection to the payment order upon the Plaintiff’s request is subject to the payment order, and there is no indication of dispute over the Plaintiff’s assertion. Since the Defendant did not appear at the date of pleading without complying with the recommendation for correction demanding specific arguments, all of the Plaintiff’s assertion is deemed to have been led to the confession of all of the facts of the Plaintiff’