If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On March 15, 2015, the Defendant driven a B K5 car on March 15, 2015, and proceeded along a five-lane between the two-lanes in the direction of Busan and the two-lanes in the direction of the shift intersection.

Since the location was an intersection with signal apparatus installed, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by observing the signal, but the defendant, despite the fact that there was a red signal on the front side, was neglected and left as it was, and the victim C was able to turn to the left from the front side of the motor vehicle in front of the left side of the motor vehicle of the defendant.

The Defendant, by the foregoing occupational negligence, injured the victim C of knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kn, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning C and G;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Written estimate, each written diagnosis, and a written confirmation of treatment;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning vehicle photographs and black stuff photographs;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the point of failing to take measures after an accident);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing is against the defendant, and the defendant speaks in favor of the victims.