However, the execution of imprisonment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 8, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the D police box located in Seoul Central Franc City, the Defendant: (b) sought coffee from a police officer working therefor; (c) sought a coffee; (d) sought it by having a set of coffee from outside the same day to a police box for light of 21:40 on the same day; and (d) sought it again by 1/3 of the staff of the Tranc in the face of the books.

“To do so by putting in the floor of the mixing with marries, francing the eggs on the floor of the marries, and raising the disturbance,” and then setting the coffee.

“To this end,” the police officer E(49) affiliated with the police box “I cannot receive a coffee. To this end, I need to do so with a coffee.

“I see the word “,” and boomed a bather E-mail.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning E police boxes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of statutes on images of each site photograph;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that there is no record of the same kind exceeding the fine, the fact that there is no wrong record, and the fact that there is no wrong record, and that there is no attempt to prevent the same

take into account the fact that it is located)