beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.02.09 2016고정813

실화

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who has worked as a kitchen at a restaurant in Southern-gu, South-gu, Dong-gu, Seoul.

On November 8, 2015, the Defendant laid down a slopped with oil on the gas sirens, and laid down a slopped with employees and television in the clopped with a slopped with a slopped with a slopped with a slopped with oil on the sloppeds.

In the end, due to the above negligence by the defendant, the oil swelds were sweld, and the swelds were moved to the front.

Accordingly, the Defendant destroyed the fire by putting all the main stations equivalent to KRW 30 million in the market price owned by D ( South, 55 years old).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made in the police statement protocol with D;

1. To describe a fire site survey report;

1. Application of image Acts and subordinate statutes to fire site photographs;

1. Article 170 (1) and Article 164 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The third floor of a building where the main room is located and the third floor of the building was located due to fire for the reasons of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; and

The defendant has been punished 14 times (7 times in office, 3 times in suspension of the execution of imprisonment, 4 times in fines) due to the crime of double-class, and D, which operates the cafeteria, does not want to be punished by the defendant (in the event of fire insurance, and the defendant did not have any record of being punished for the same kind of crime and did not have any compensation for damage). The defendant did not have any record of being punished for the same crime, and reflects the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, etc., and other various sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, and environment, shall be determined as ordered by the order.