장물취득등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. At around 19:30 on February 3, 2012, the Defendant acquired 250,000 won in the price knowing that the victim E was a stolen charge of gallon S2 smartphone 1 cost, which is equivalent to 900,000 won in the market price of the victim E owned by the Defendant, from the 'C' bank located in the Daegu Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, as well as the acquisition of 29,00 won in the price, even though he was aware of the fact that the charge was a stolen charge, such as the list of crimes in the attached Form. from around that time to March 22, 2013, the Defendant knowingly acquired 29,00 won in total, which is a stolen charge.
2. Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint coercion) committed a theft by a victim D (the age of 17) who borrowed a gallon or a motorcycle, acquired from a taxi driver with no name as stated in attached Table 4, and stored in F’s motorcycle.
While the Defendant demanded the victim to reimburse by telephone, on November 2012, the Defendant sought the victim’s residence in the Seocho-gu, Daegu Police Officer, as well as G, which was the second Korean War, and went to the “H” restaurant in the Daegu-gu, Seogu, and was on the victim’s own vehicle.
G had already finished a supper, referring to “one among the advisers of a white paper,” and 4 glicks by suppering a supper by a supper, and let the Defendant drink in a supper, and the Defendant suppered 3 glicks by suppering a supper, supper, and suppering a supper.”
The Defendant continued to have the victim of the Guto sit on the vehicle, with the I Elementary School playground located in Daegu-gu Franchi, G, with the victim “20 wheels return”, and the Defendant given the victim a crop, “Crop, dead,” and caused the victim to look about about 10 times in the said playground.
As a result, the defendant, together with the above G, threatened the victim to commit an act of non-performance of obligation.
Summary of Evidence
1..