However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 6, 2015, the Defendant found the “F office” of the victims E (54 tax) operator of Pyeongtaek-si D around 10:00, and provided the victim with the “F office,” “B received the payment of KRW 5 million from B, and returned the payment of the scrap metal to B.” However, the victim refused it, and the victim took a bath mutually with the victim, and did not have the victim’s body.”

At around 10:20 the same day, the Defendant waiting for the victim while waiting for the victim while waiting for the truck on the road in front of the above F. In a specific case, whether a dangerous object constitutes “hazardous object” as provided for in Article 258-2 of the Criminal Act should be determined depending on whether, in light of social norms, the use of the object could cause harm to the life or body of the other party or a third party (see Supreme Court Decision 2007Do3520, Mar. 26, 2009). In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence of each judgment, namely, (a) the Defendant intentionally waiting for the victim to board the truck while waitinging for the truck by collecting claims with the victim, etc., and (b) the victim caused harm to the victim’s body by failing to give treatment to the other party, and (c) the Defendant caused harm to the victim’s body by failing to give treatment to the injured party or his body.

As such, the truck constitutes “hazardous things” as provided in Article 258-2 of the Criminal Act.

The driver of the above truck was placed on the top of the driver's seat of the above truck, and was placed on the top of the string of the string of the string and the string of the string line.

The defendant carries dangerous things.