beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.06.02 2015고정294

상해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000 (private million).

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 1, 2014, at around 05:30, the 5.18 Memorial Cultural Center located in Seo-gu, Gwangju, Seo-gu, Gwangju, 152, the victim C (55 years of age) accumulated a horn on the ground that he interfered with the progress of his own taxi while making a personal taxi, and added the horn for "Chewing feas, prompt feas," "grad, feas, feas".

The Defendant: (a) flicked the bend part of the victim, who is sitting in the driver’s seat by drinking the car; (b) flicked the flick with his hand from the car; (c) flicked the flick; (d) flicked twice in the middle part of the driver’s seat; (d) flicked the head by hand, and flicked the back part of the driver’s seat; and (e) flicked the back part of the driver’s seat owned by the victim, one to two times in the middle of the driver’s seat; and (e) flicked the front part of the driver’s seat by drinking.

As a result, the defendant suffered from cerebral typhism and dystrophal typhism in need of treatment for about 2 weeks, and damaged the victim's vehicle in amount to KRW 817,661.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C and E;

1. Each protocol of suspect examination of the police accused and C;

1. Statement of E by the police;

1. Each statement A and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes (Evidence Nos. 10, 11, 16, 17, 18, 26 of the Evidence List Nos. 10, 11, 17, 18, 26) of the suspected victim C’s early damaged photograph, part of the bottom damage photograph of the suspected victim C’s D driving seat of the suspected victim C; D damaged photograph, a written estimate

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines for negligence;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, the amount of fine stipulated in the summary order of this case cannot be deemed to be imposed in light of the following: (a) the background and consequence of the above case; (b) the act of the accused before and after the commission of the crime; (c) whether the

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.