A. Error of facts or misapprehension of legal principles (Defendants) of the Game Industry Promotion Act (hereinafter “Game Industry Promotion Act”). The same applies to the part of the violation (Defendants A) ① [Defendants] of the Game Industry Promotion Act (hereinafter “instant game machine”). < Amended by Act No. 11210, Jan. 20, 2012; Act No. 11204, Jan. 20, 2012; Act No. 12135, Jan. 20, 2012; Act No. 12014, Jan. 20, 2012; Act No. 13035, Feb. 23,

(2) The Defendant did not alter or manipulate a game machine, and there is no example function that informs customers of the function or winning of the score generated regardless of the user participation. The Defendant merely provided customers with a free right to use a game score, which is not a reuse right, and did not exchange the game machine via a person called “L.”

No one has operated. The contents stated in the summary of oral argument submitted after the deadline for submitting the statement of grounds of appeal are examined to the extent that it supplements the grounds for appeal. 2) The Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes) has been reduced.

(hereinafter the same shall apply)

The part of the crime of violation (refinite crime, etc.) (Defendant A) only found the victim He in order to divide the conversation, and there is no threat to the above victim.

B. The lower court’s respective sentence against the Defendants on the grounds of unreasonable sentencing (the Defendants and the Prosecutor) is too unreasonable.

(E) the above sentence is too unhued and unfair on the contrary.

(2) The Defendants’ assertion of mistake or misapprehension of the legal principle

가. 게임산업법위반죄 부분(피고인들) 1 피고인 A의 주장에 대하여 ㈎ 원심은 아래와 같이 판단하였다.

① The instant game machine is irrelevant to user capacity.