If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000 shall apply.

In order for South Korean residents to visit North Korea, the Minister of Unification’s approval for visit shall be obtained, and even if the approval for visit is not obtained by fraud or other improper means, the Defendant obtained personal information, photographs, etc. from the G manager of the company submitted to F, the original contractor located in Seocho-gu Seoul E 312 on July 13, 2015, with the aim of allowing C to enter the GIC for the settlement of the construction cost of new buildings located in the GIC district, even if C is not a D employee, and obtained approval from the Minister of Unification by falsely applying for access to the Internet online access system, as the C is a D employee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C and G;

1. Once internal investigation (related to the approval of visit by the C GG) and individual entry and departure status [The evidence above shows that C does not have any employee who is not employed in D, but has received benefits from D, and North Korea for the settlement of construction price at the request of the defendant, and the defendant, in order to pretend that C is a member of D, falsely prepares a standard labor contract period for daily workers employed on a construction who entered the period from June 20, 2015 to December 20, 2015, and obtained the approval of C’s North Korea by using it, and thus, the defendant is liable for the violation of the Inter-Korea Exchange and Cooperation Act.]

1. Article 27 (1) 2 and Article 9 (1) of the Inter-Korean Exchange and Cooperation Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;