When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 01:30 on August 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) brought an injury on the victim D (year 21) who was at a time in front of the C convenience store located in Sinpo City C, on the ground that the victim D (year 21) was to serve as a defendant; (b) taken a part of the victim’s face at one time on a drinking-time basis; and (c) taken one-time face of the victim’s face, and kids the victim’s face one time, and caused the victim’s injury, such as a closed thring, in need of treatment for about three weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to on-site photographs and death diagnoses;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act has already been punished several times for the same kind of crime. In particular, considering the fact that the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime and the execution thereof was completed, and that the crime of this case was committed without taking the sentence even during the repeated crime period, and the degree of damage in the crime of this case cannot be deemed to be less severe in terms of the above crime, while considering the circumstances that the defendant appears to recognize and reflect the crime of this case, and that the defendant agreed smoothly with the victim during the trial of this case, it shall be considered as favorable.

In addition to each of the above sentencing grounds, it is decided as per Disposition by comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relation, environment, circumstances after the crime, and result, etc.