Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Since the defendant is doubtful that the husband B and the victim C are in in incompetence relations, the defendant filed a divorce lawsuit against the above B and continues to exist.

On December 4, 2017, at around 17:50, the Defendant made a telephone conversation with D, the land owner of the above B, and said D, saying, “The above B and the victim are in in in in influorial relationship” to the effect that the said B and the victim were in influorial relationship, “I am fluorddddd by drinking or flading at the packaging end,” and that I am flad by this further flag, as the 10th superior, and I am flag, while I am flag. I am flag, while I am flag. I am am flag.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of recording-D Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;