Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

On February 28, 2013, from around 04:40 to 05:25 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) stated that “The victim C, who had been in the Gu-gu B, was an employee, in the D convenience store, and without any reason, had been drunked, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s convenience store business by force by leaving the entrance of the entrance and the front of the entrance and the front of the calculating unit, such as “if the convenience store address is opened, his name is opened, a card is opened, a flabed, a flab, and a flab, a flab, and a flab, a flab,” without any reason.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs and CCTV photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 314 (1) of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. According to the evidence and the record of the obligation of prisoners as seen above on the determination of the Defendant’s mental and physical assertion of the provisional payment order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the fact that the Defendant had drinking alcohol at the time of committing the crime, and the fact that the Defendant was taking the clothes by prescribing the liver drugs, but the Defendant did not have the ability to discern things or make decisions.

The defendant's assertion cannot be accepted as it seems to be in a state or weak condition.