If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

1. On April 29, 2015, from around 21:20 on April 29, 2015 to 21:40 the same day, the Defendant interfered with the business, even though he/she did drinking with women who were unable to know the name in the victim E’s 'F' house located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and was forced from the victim and his/her employee at the above head house, he/she continued to take a heavy bath for the above women in spite of whether he/she was expelled from the victim and his/her employee at the above head, and continued to take a heavy bath for the above women. After smoking in the above head house, the Defendant took a heavy bath for G, thereby interfering with the victim’s door operation by force.

2. The Defendant discovered that he heard the victim’s statement at the time and place indicated in the preceding clause of the obstruction of performance of official duties, at the time and place of the 112 report, and found that Da, “Chose, police openings, and will be equal to that of the victim,” and that “Chose, police openings, etc. will be equal to that of the victim.” The Defendant obstructed the legitimate execution of official duties related to the arrest of police officers by assaulting the victim, such as assaulting the Hase, Hase I’s chest from the Hase J, and Hase I’s chest who heard that he would be arrested as a flagrant offender under the suspicion of assaulting G, such as the Hase J from the Hase K, and caused I to go beyond the floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police statement to G and J (including I statement parts) statute;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the victim E and G, respectively, shall be agreed.