However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

1. On March 22, 2013, the Defendant: (a) put F into a single psychotropic-related psychotropic drug injection machine; (b) melted F in a single psychotropic-related mobile phone; (c) recorded F in a single psychotropic-related mobile phone; and (d) injected F into the Defendant’s arms bloodline.

2. At around 22:00 on April 12, 2013, the Defendant, at the guest room No. 801 of the EM, administered F with the volume of philophone in the same manner as that of the foregoing Paragraph 1.

3. On October 12, 2013, around 03:00, the Defendant put about approximately 0.03 ghon-phones into a single-use injection machine at Hmomoto G located in Busanjin-gu, Busan, and melted them with water, and administered them for arms.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol of examination of the suspect against the defendant and I by the prosecution and copies thereof;

1. A copy of the statement made by each prosecutor to the F;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Requests for appraisal made by the president of the National Institute of Scientific Investigation;

1. Photographs (at the entrance, exit, etc.);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (specific relation to a place of crime, response to training of mert cancers, etc.);

1. Articles 60 (1) 2, 4 (1) 1, and 2 subparagraph 3 (b) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. of Specific Crimes;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (the defendant has no record of criminal punishment for the same crime, and considering all other circumstances, such as the background, means, and methods leading to the crime of this case);

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc., of community service orders;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reason that the market price for one-time medication is not less than 100,000 won under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc.; and