청소년보호법위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (one year of suspended sentence for four months) of the lower court’s punishment is excessive and unfair, and the “Wran tavern” as stated in the written judgment of the lower court is a clerical error in the “Winginginging practice room” and must be corrected.
2. The crime of this case in light of the fact that the crime of this case was committed by running a singing practice room and allowing a juvenile to work as the so-called "domination", and the nature of the crime is not good. In addition, considering the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, and environment, it is not recognized that the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.
[However, pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, each "singing bar" listed in the criminal facts of paragraph (5) of the judgment of the court below in the judgment of the court below as "singinging bar", and each "Juvenile Protection Act" listed in the pertinent Article of the Act and the election of punishment for a criminal fact" among the applicable columns of statutes shall be corrected as "former Juvenile Protection Act (amended by Act No. 11048, Sep. 15, 20