저작권법위반
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of facts charged shall not be infringed by means of reproduction, performance, public transmission, exhibition, transmission, distribution, lease, or preparation of derivative works, of property rights protected under the Copyright Act, such as author's property rights;
Nevertheless, at around 20:58 on December 11, 2012, the Defendant, a corporate body, engaged in the music copyright management business at the “Cnoo-gu, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, 503, under which he operated the music copyright management business, used the outlines of the musical works, other than the conditions of the musical works and the musical works, for musical reflects without obtaining a license for musical works from the Korea Music Copyright Association.
Accordingly, the Defendant infringed on the author’s property right in the above manner.
2. The facts charged in the instant case constitute Article 136(1) of the Copyright Act and may be prosecuted only when a complaint is filed pursuant to the main sentence of Article 140 of the same Act. According to the records entered in the letter of cancellation of the complaint filed in the records, the complainant can be acknowledged as having cancelled the complaint against the Defendant on August 28, 2013, which is the date of the instant indictment. Thus, the instant indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 5 of the