2. The fact that the defendant is against his fault is favorable to the defendant.

However, even though there was a history of punishment several times for the same kind of crime, each of the crimes of this case was committed again during the repeated crime period, and taking into account various sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court against the Defendant is too unreasonable. Thus, the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.