If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

The defendant is operating a marina business site B.

(H-2) No foreigner with the same qualification shall be employed outside the scope of the category of business allowed to be employed as a qualification for sojourn.

Nevertheless, from November 3, 2013 to December 4, 2013, the Defendant illegally employed the Chinese nationality C (D,n) of which he/she did not have the status of stay eligible for employment at marina business establishment, to pay KRW 1,00,000 per month to the Bma branch business establishment located in E at Yangju-si. From December 3, 2013 to December 4, 2013, the Defendant illegally employed the F (G, and South) of Chinese nationality of the same China on the condition that he/she would pay KRW 1,00,000 per month at the same place and let many and unspecified persons math.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written opinions, accusation, written confirmation of foreign employment, written employment statement to C and F, written notice of review and decision on immigration offenders, written notice of investigation of current status, and written report on investigation activities;

1. Article 94 Subparag. 9 and Article 18(3) of the former Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 121915, Jan. 7, 2014) regarding criminal facts

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;