However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On November 22, 2013, the Defendant: (a) carried out fluorcing and gathering the victim D (nives, age 13) through a fluorcing case of smartphone, Defendant A, on November 22, 2013; (b) had the victim at his/her own house, and notified the victim of his/her home when he/she had sexual intercourse with the victim; (c) had the victim known his/her home of his/her home.

Therefore, around 17:00 on the same day, the victim was found to be the victim's headroom 603, Seo-gu, Daejeon, where the defendant was the defendant's house, and the defendant went to the workplace after the victim gets in his house. At around 23:00 on the same day as the house, the victim intending to have a sexual intercourse with the victim with the victim, but the victim intending to have a sexual intercourse with the victim. However, even at the night around November 23, 2013, the victim's chest and the knife were flick and the knife were flick, and the knife was flick with the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant inducedd the victim for the purpose of sexual intercourse.

2. On November 23, 2013, while the Defendant B was staying in A’s residence as described in paragraph 1, the victim sought from A the word “her birth was written in writing in our house.” The victim sought from A the word “her birth was written in our house,” and found the other party who would resolve the board and lodging through a fluent case called “veling lusium” of smartphones.

On the same day, the Defendant had been engaged in hosting with the victim through the above fishing case, and the victim had been living together with the male in Daejeon and agreed to play with the defective victim who was able to be able to play together with the victim by asking him as the place where she had been living with the male.

The victim, around November 24, 2013, "I am at home" from A is contacted by the victim.