beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.03.28 2019고단334

마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)

Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, as to the defendants, the two-year period from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Although both Defendants were not a person handling narcotics, they handled “Yab,” a narcotics containing psychotropic drugs as follows, although they were not a person handling narcotics as a foreigner of the nationality of Thailand.

1. Defendant A’s sole criminal conduct, around September 2018, around 20:00, sold to E (E, one-time “F”; hereinafter “F”) in front of the D factory located in Sungsung-si, E (E, one-time “F”; hereinafter “F”) for two (100,000 won.

2. Defendants’ co-principal conduct

A. On September 2018, 2018, the Defendants were willing to sell the camping, and around 20:00 on September 2018, 2018, Defendant A (hereinafter “G”) agreed to contact with H (H, one-day “I”; hereinafter “I”) to sell camping, and Defendant B (B, one-day “J”; hereinafter “J”) received KRW 10,000 from Defendant G with “I” at the place specified in paragraph (1).

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to sell baba in collusion.

B. On November 2018, 2018, the Defendants, who were to sell bab, agreed to sell bab, and around 20:0 on November 2018, the Defendant’s “G” decided to contact with “F” and sell bab,” and the Defendant’s “J” decided to receive KRW 1.50,00 from “F” at the place specified in paragraph (1) with the Defendant’s “G” in advance with the Defendant’s “C”, and the Defendant’s “J” agreed to receive KRW 30,00 from “F” last.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to sell baba in collusion.

C. Around December 10, 2018, the Defendants are willing to sell the camping at the same time, and around 20:00 on December 10, 2018, Defendant G agreed to contact with “I” and sell camping. Defendant J received 100,00 won from “I” at the place specified in paragraph (1) with “G”, subject to the second rule, at the place specified in paragraph (1).

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to sell baba in collusion.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's office against the Defendants.