대여금
1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 90 million and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from July 30, 2015 to the day of complete payment.
1. Comprehensively taking account of the purport of Gap evidence No. 1 and the entire pleadings as to the cause of the claim, the defendant may recognize the fact that on June 16, 2010, the certificate of promissory note No. 2200, par value of KRW 90,000,000, and the date of payment of which is payable, at the Plaintiff and Samungung Law Firm's General Law Office.
Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from July 30, 2015 to the day of full payment, which is the day following the delivery of the original copy of the instant payment order, to the day of full payment, as the Plaintiff seeks.
2. The defendant's assertion is alleged to the effect that the defendant paid KRW 70 million, including principal and interest, but there is no evidence to acknowledge this. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.