beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.04.17 2014가단5069484

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The Defendant shall start on April 11, 2013 with respect to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 38,000,000, and KRW 2,000,000 for each of the said money to the Plaintiff B and C.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

(a) Fact-finding 1) E means the Fpoter II vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) around 14:35 April 11, 2013.

) A driver, while driving and turn to the left at the right side of the middle apartment road in the intersection where there is no signal apparatus located in the 715-dong, Jung-gu, Seoul, to the right side of the middle apartment, and the H Obaba (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff Obaba”) of the Plaintiff A driver, who was driving from the right side of the middle-gu, the two-lane distance to the middle-speed teacher.

) The collision with the other (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

2) As a result of the instant accident, the Plaintiff suffered losses, such as minculverization of the left-hand boom, minculation of the left-hand sculver, sculverization of sculvers, right-hand sullls, and mincul

3) The Plaintiff C and B are the parents of the Plaintiff, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the Defendant vehicle. According to the fact of recognition of liability, the Defendant was injured by the Plaintiff due to the operation of the Defendant vehicle, barring any special circumstance, and thus, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is liable for the damages suffered by the Plaintiffs due to the instant accident as the insurer of the Defendant vehicle. (C) However, even though the Defendant was in a direct position and left left-hand turn, the Defendant’s liability ratio is limited to 80% in consideration of the fact that it is difficult for the Plaintiff to be deemed that the Plaintiff was in full-time duty in light of the situation before and after the collision of the Defendant vehicle with the Defendant vehicle, and it is difficult to deem that the Plaintiff was in full-time duty in light of the situation before and after the collision between the Plaintiff Obama and the Defendant vehicle. 【No dispute is recognized.’

2. Except as otherwise stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each item of the [attached Form] damages calculation table shall be the same as the corresponding item, and the convenience period shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The amount of damages shall be calculated at the rate of 5/12 per month at the time of the accident.