손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claim added in the trial are all dismissed.
2. After an appeal is filed.
1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the part of “judgment” of the first instance judgment in Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act is dismissed; and (b) the part of “judgment” in Article 420 of the first instance judgment is cited except for adding a judgment on the conjunctive claim asserted by the Plaintiff in this court.
2. Paragraph 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance, which has been written after the dismissal, is as follows.
According to the purport of the whole statement and pleading of Nos. 3 through 5, 9, 10, 13, and 17 (including Serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply) of A, the Defendants did not submit to the Plaintiff’s loan agreement for KRW 15,00,000 on April 28, 199. The Plaintiff’s loan of KRW 16,00,000 to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff’s loan of KRW 23,00,000 to the Plaintiff’s account of KRW 9,000 in order to repay the above loan balance, and the Plaintiff’s loan of KRW 1,50,000 to the Plaintiff’s account of KRW 1,50 was not confirmed as the loan of KRW 1,96, 199, and KRW 2,000,000 to the Plaintiff’s loan of KRW 1,50,000 to the Plaintiff’s agricultural cooperative account of KRW 9,197.