If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The Defendant purchased a mobile phone, which was stolen at a soup sabry b, etc. in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, at the same time, and attempted to use the Internet NAber C set, and to gain profits worth KRW 2-60,000 per sell.

On February 26, 2012, around 07:30 on February 26, 2012, the Defendant acquired stolen goods with knowledge of the fact that 4 cost of a cellphone 4 cost of a mobile phone owned by 3,200,000 won, such as the victim F, etc. who stolen B, D, and E, in front of the U.S. child in Gangnam-gu Seoul, from January 27, 2012 to February 26, 2012, the Defendant acquired stolen the stolen goods with knowledge of the fact that 35 cell phone volume of a mobile phone which was stolen by B, D, E, G, and H, from the street of the U.S. child in front of the U.S. to February 26, 2012.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The protocol of examination of the police accused against B, D, E, G, and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Relevant Article 362 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 362 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or more;