However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

The Defendant, with respect to the claim for damages between B and C (e.g., Mine District Court 2014Da36066), concluded with C on behalf of B by delegation of all powers, such as agreement, and agreed with C on behalf of B, and the fact was, despite the agreement between C and B, that “B shall pay KRW 8 million to C,” but the agreement between C was made between C and B, was forged as if it was the agreement between C to pay the agreed amount of KRW 13 million, and then, was used to obtain by deceiving B the difference between the actual agreement amount of KRW 8 million and the forged document amount of KRW 13 million.

1. On December 12, 2014, the Defendant forged private document: (a) using a computer located in the Defendant’s office located in the fourth floor of the Dong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City D Building; (b) “Agreement” in the title column; (c) “C” in the Plaintiff’s case number column; (d) “B” in the Defendant’s column; and (e) “B” in the content column, the Plaintiff printed out a document stating that “the Plaintiff shall receive 13 million won from the Defendant B on December 12, 2014, and submit the withdrawal letter; and (e) on the same day, the Plaintiff shall set the agent E and the agreement at the public service center of the Gwangju Special Metropolitan City District Court located in the 7-12, Dong-gu, Gwangju, by setting the amount of KRW 8 million; and (e) signed the agreement with the agent E and sealed it in the name subsequent to the above document after obtaining a seal from E, not aware that the agreement was written in KRW 13 million.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of agreement in the name of C, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On December 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) exercised the aforesaid forged agreement with B, as if it were a document duly formed, at the house located in the Nam-gu Seoul metropolitan area, Nam-gu, Gwangju; (b) as if it was a document duly formed.

3. The Defendant’s fraud, around December 12, 2014, refers to “C” to the victim at the victim’s house located in the Southern-gu Gwangju Metropolitan City F (year 81).