However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On February 19, 2017, around 22:20, the Defendant: (a) boarded a bus No. 60 on the street prior to the exit of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government No. 40 Simsan Station No. 8, Simsan Station No. 40, and took a bath, and was obstructed the operation of the bus, and was dispatched to the site after receiving a report of 112, the Defendant sent the bus to the Seoul Young-gu Police Station C District D and the Gyeong-si E.

D and E opened a chief door of the defective patrol vehicle in order to leave the scene by getting on the patrol vehicle, and opened the chief door of the patrol vehicle in order to stop, and the boom E, who was on board the chief of the patrol vehicle in order to break up, was tightly off from the top of the above vehicle and was on the top of the boom, was tightly on the boom and was on the boom of the above vehicle.

Although the Defendant continued to leave the patrol car from the above police officers, he refused it, and the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 112 Report Report case by assaulting D, such as making the Defendant forced to get the Defendant into force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a witness for the preparation of E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reason that Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the defendant is pening in depth and that the defendant is old) is more than 62 (1).