특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving a Crodic car.
On January 17, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car with drinking alcohol around 00:05, and proceeded with the front of the E-ju store D at Fapo City, using the trium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium.
Since there are frequent places for pedestrians to pass along as a road where no delivery is installed separately, there is a duty of care to reduce speed and prevent accidents in advance by driving safely by checking well the left and right of the driver of the vehicle.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and got her part of the victim F(19 years of age) who was her flock in the direction of the Defendant’s proceeding before the Defendant’s proceeding. The Defendant was her flock in front of the left-hand flock in which the Defendant was driving.
Ultimately, the defendant suffered approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence of the victim.
2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of measurement) has reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking, smelling, drinking, and drinking, from the police officers belonging to the G District District of the Yeongdeungpo Police Station G District, called out after having caused a traffic accident as stated in paragraph (1) of the same Article, by means of inserting three minutes from January 17, 2015 to March 3, 201: (a) although the Defendant was requested to comply with the alcohol measurement by inserting the breath in a breath for three minutes from around 01:10 on January 17, 2015 to around 01:3, the Defendant continued to refuse to comply with the request for measurement of alcohol by a police officer without justifiable grounds.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Partial statement of the witness F in the court;
1. Each police statement made to F and I;
1. A medical certificate;
1. The photograph of the refusal of drinking alcohol measurement and the suspect are snishing tobacco in G District.