The Defendant at the Hanwon around November 7, 2014, and the same year.

9. From around 17. to undergo a fluoral surgery necessary for the pain treatment of the right bluse bluse bluse, while performing the flueing surgery to the victim G (62 taxes) who was found in order to undergo the fluse bluse surgery, he/she neglected his/her duty of care to prevent the fluoral from being damaged by his/her occupational negligence and caused the victim to suffer damage to the right blue bluse bluse bluse bluse in which defluse bluse is inserted into the part of the victim's right blu

2. Determination:

A. The burden of proof and the burden of proof necessary for conviction in a criminal trial is to be borne by a public prosecutor. The conviction is to be based on evidence with probative value sufficient to ensure the judge that the facts charged are true to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, even if there is doubt about the defendant's guilt, it is inevitable to determine the defendant's interest (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Do1151, Jul. 22, 2010). (b) At the time of the autopsy, the facts charged in the instant case are under the premise that the defendant excessively inserted the part on the right part of the right part of the G's body, and thus, the defendant directly damaged the boom and damaged the body of the defendant due to the booming of the boom or the brupting of the body.

Therefore, in full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, the defendant inserted the depth blue part of G's right blue part of G at the time of the instant procedure.