폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동재물손괴등)등
Defendant
All appeals filed against the Defendants by A, C, D and Prosecutor are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal of the defendant A, C, and D is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor's grounds for appeal against the defendants are too unabrupted so that each sentence of the first instance (the fine of 2,00,000,000 won for the defendant B, the fine of 1,50,000 won for the defendant C, the fine of 1,50,000 won for the defendant C, and the fine of 4,00,000 won for the defendant D) is too unreasonable. The prosecutor's grounds for appeal against the defendants are too unabrupted and unfair.
2. The crime of this case committed by the Defendants on the part of the new wall time is not sufficient to commit the crime of this case, and the crime of this case is fluorted by the Defendants, who intrude into the structure in such a way that many Defendants jointly damage the structure, etc., and thus interfere with their business by force.
However, on the other hand, the Defendants recognized all of the instant crimes and divided.
In light of such circumstances as the degree of the Defendants’ participation in the commission of the crime, motive and means of the crime, age of the Defendants, sexual conduct, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, and criminal records, it cannot be said that each of the first deliberations is too unreasonable or unfair because it is too unreasonable.
3. If so, the appeal against the Defendants A, C, D, and prosecutor is without merit. Thus, all appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.