변호사법위반
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
80,000,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.
Punishment of the crime
1. On May 27, 2009, the Defendant was released on October 28, 201, when he was sentenced to a three-year and six-month imprisonment due to an occupational breach of trust, etc. at the Seoul High Court, and the parole period was expired on August 5, 201, in a medical institution for the Government.
2. The Defendant is a representative director of the FF from 2002 to 2006, a person who held office as G representative director from 2007 to 2008, and H is a representative director of the I who supplies a proton, which is a person who uses feed to F, and J is dispatched to F under G father from 2008 and 2010 to 2014 and takes charge of duties such as the selection of feed and the selection of a mixed-form ratio.
The Defendant received a solicitation from H to “G representative L to make it possible to supply feed additives as existing ones,” in the event that the amount of prodials is reduced due to the change of G representative from K to L on April 5, 2014.”
Accordingly, the Defendant demanded H to make a solicitation to offer a pro bono, through L, a pro bono, “L is a subordinate employee at the time of an election of a representative of G, and helps many people in the election at the time of an election of a representative of G,” with the same kind of relationship.
Since then, the Defendant received the “amount equivalent to KRW 10 million per month if the monthly supply quantity is 90 tons or less, and KRW 100 million per km in the case of below 90 tons” under the pretext of supply solicitation for H and L.
around June 2014, the Defendant received KRW 10 million according to the supply quantity (88.7 tons) in May 2014 from J upon H’s request at N’s office, which was located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office Mtel.
In addition, from around that time to April 2015, the Defendant received a total of KRW 80 million as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form.
Accordingly, the defendant received a total of KRW 80 million from H under the pretext of solicitation or good offices for the affairs handled by a person who is deemed a public official.
(i) the evidence;