2. There are no circumstances that may be considered favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant, who recognized all of the crimes of this case, appears to reflect the attitude of the defendant, that the defendant has no past record of criminal punishment or of criminal punishment of suspension of qualification or more severe punishment for the same crime, and that the defendant suffers from acute dyphosome, suffering from health disorder, etc., and that the health

However, in light of the following factors: (a) the amount of damage caused by each of the instant crimes reaches KRW 120 million; (b) most of the damage remains unrepared; and (c) other factors of sentencing as indicated in the records and arguments on the changes, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstances of each of the instant crimes, and circumstances before and after the instant crimes, etc., the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is too too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.