However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 5, 2017, at around 11:40, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol while getting in and returning to C-si operated by B in the document of Busan, Busan, and around 12:21 on the same day, the above taxi was in the front of “E” located in D in Busan, Busan, but at around 12:21 on the same day, the Defendant filed a report with 112 to the police officer to help the Defendant.

피고인은 같은 날 12:25 경 위 ‘E’ 앞 도로에 정차한 택시 안에서, 112 신고를 받고 출동한 부산진 경찰서 F 지구대 소속 경위 G이 “ 선생님 일어나 보세요 ”라고 하면서 자신의 어깨를 수차례 흔들어 깨우자, 잠에서 깨어나 G을 쳐다본 다음 “ 씨 발 뭐꼬 꺼져 라” 고 욕설을 하면서 왼쪽 팔꿈치를 들어 G을 때리려고 하였고, 이에 G은 양손으로 피고인을 붙잡아 제지하면서 “ 뭐하시는 겁니까.

The police officer called up.

Action Finding도요도요

“Admonishing” warning.

The Defendant continued to stand from H of the same scam.

Along with son's life, I cannot tow it.

Recognizing the word "", I tried to gather test plastic paper on the floor and see "Ch's face" as "Ch', which contains urban communities that were in possession of a taxi," but was put from H to check whether he was dead.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties on the handling of the 112 reported case.

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of each police statement protocol to G, H, B, and I;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the responsibility of a police officer to commit violence on the grounds of sentencing on Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is not easy, and that is also the case in 2012.