beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.08.19 2014나2034780

채무부존재확인

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid additionally shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case is as stated in the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the dismissal or addition under Paragraph 2 below, and therefore, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. A part which is dismissed or added in the judgment of the first instance;

A. On the 6th and 3th of the judgment of the first instance court, "the result of the fact-finding on the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service of the court of first instance" is "the result of the fact-finding on the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service of the court of first instance", "the result of the fact-finding on the plaintiff representative director of the court of first instance" in the 8th and 2th of the 8th of the 11th of the 11th of the 11th of the 11th of the 11th of the 11th of the 11th of the 11th of the 10th of the 10th of the 10th of the 10th of the 11th of the 10th of the 10th of the 10th of the 10th of the 10th of the 11th of the 10th of the 11th of the 10th of the 10th of the 1st instance.

B. Part VI through VI of the decision of the court of first instance is as follows.

According to the above facts and circumstances, the circumstance that the product of this case was excluded from the medical care benefits subject to the notice issued by the Minister of Health and Welfare as of March 1, 2012 by the Ministry of Health and Welfare constitutes a case where the sale of the product of this case is affected by the legal system problems, such as the permission and the reduction of the insurance termination price under Article 8(2) of the exclusive sales contract of this case, and in such a case, the termination of the exclusive sales contract of this case by agreement with the Plaintiff is also included in the modification of the terms of the contract stipulated in the same provision.

However, this is the case.