beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.03.17 2015가단5338644

대여금

Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 30,231,043 as well as KRW 175,345,936 from July 30, 2015 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a credit transaction agreement as follows.

(1) On March 18, 2009, the loan limit of 200 million won is extended to March 12, 2010 (the expiration date of the loan period after this date is extended to March 11, 201; hereinafter “one loan”) (2) March 3, 2008, the loan limit of 150 million won for enterprise driving loans, the loan limit of 100 million won for enterprise driving loans, 26 February 25, 201 (the expiration date of the loan period is extended to February 25, 201; hereinafter “2 loan”) and the expiration date of the loan period will be extended to 200,000 won for 20,000 won for enterprise driving loans, 60,000 won for enterprise driving loans, and 40,000,000 won for 20,000 after the expiration date of the loan period (hereinafter “the expiration date of the loan period”).

B. At the time of each of the above agreements, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to pay damages for delay equivalent to the number of days of delay calculated on a daily basis as calculated on the basis of the Plaintiff bank’s interest rate as 365 days from the date of the termination of the credit period, when the Defendant did not perform its obligation upon the expiration of the credit period, or when it lost its interest pursuant to Article 7 of

C. Thereafter, the Defendant’s remaining principal and interest of a loan as of July 29, 2015 are KRW 126,930,415 (the principal and interest of a loan shall be KRW 66,50,000 (the principal and interest of a loan shall be KRW 22,50,000), KRW 92,727,419 (the principal and interest of a loan shall be KRW 51,08,259), and KRW 64,240,021 (the principal and interest of a loan shall be KRW 35,37,677) in the case of a loan made once.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1-4, Gap evidence Nos. 2 and 3, and the purport of whole pleadings.