In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fines, only 100,000.

1. On February 5, 2015, from around 15:20 to 15:50 the same day, Defendant A: (a) discovered that the victim F, who operates the instant business under the trade name, around Dong-dong Building A, E, would install a bridge and run the said A-dong 301 director work; and (b) obstructed the victim’s moving-out work by force by parking the GM3 car on the side of the said bridge.

2. On February 5, 2015, from around 15:20 to 15:50 the same day, Defendant B: (a) discovered that the victim F, who operates the instant business under the trade name “E”, sought to install a bridge car and to carry out the said A-A-A-A-A-A-301 director work, and obstructed the victim’s transfer of the vehicle by force by parking the HKan-A-A-A-car on the back part of the said bridge.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness F, I, and J;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. The Defendants: Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for negligence

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Defendants of litigation costs: the main sentence of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act