beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.08.05 2014나6191

임대차보증금

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid additionally shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On March 31, 2005, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant for lease of approximately 116 square meters (hereinafter “instant store”) out of part of the 116 square meters of a commercial building with the light steel structure board, framed roof, which is located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu (hereinafter “instant commercial building”) owned by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant lease contract”). The Plaintiff paid KRW 40,000,000, monthly rent, KRW 200,000, and KRW 40,000,000 to the Defendant for the lease term of two years (hereinafter “instant lease contract”).

B. After that, while the Plaintiff renewed the instant lease contract on three occasions, it has been performing design and supervision in the name of “D” at the instant store.

C. On May 15, 2013, when the Plaintiff was using the instant store, the instant commercial building, including the instant store, was destroyed by fire around 12:05 (hereinafter “the instant fire”), and thus, the instant store was no longer usable for use as intended under the instant lease agreement.

The member of the National Institute of Scientific Investigation published the results of appraisal on the fire of this case in the following contents:

1) A commercial building is a structure of a sand site panel, where D, E, F, G, and H commercial buildings are located on the basis of the front left left side of the building, where 1 household building (recincinc incinc inc incinc inc inc incinc inc inc inc incinc inc inc inc incinc inc incinc inc inc incinc inc incinc inc incinc incinc inc incinc incinc incinc inc incinc incinc incinc incinc incinc incinc inc incinc incinc incinc incinc incinc incinc incinc incinc incinc incinc incinc incinc incinc inc incinc inc inc incinc inc inc incinc inc in