However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender on February 29, 2016 on the same day on the same day, and was sitting in a suspect protection seat in C District of a police station located in the Mayang-gu B, Mayang-gu, Boyang-si, B, and around 04:20 on the same day, and the Defendant was growing to police officers, such as D in the process of working at the place.

The brination of bitch, bitch, flus, etc., caused flusent D through 10 times, thereby hindering the legitimate performance of public duties concerning the current custody and supervision of police officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A E-document;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines / [the scope of the recommended punishment / [the scope of the recommended punishment] The Act on Interference with the Performance of Official Duties in the Case of Class 1 of the Act on Interference with the Performance of Official Duties (Obstruction of Performance of Duties and Forced Performance of Duties)], the basic area (from June to January 4) (

2. The sentencing conditions, such as the age, sex, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered in full consideration of the following circumstances: (a) the sentence is to be imposed; (b) the sentence is to be imposed as ordered.

The crime of this case at a disadvantage: The defendant obstructed the performance of official duties by means of spits, spits, etc. while taking a bath against a police officer working without any special reason, and the crime of this case is against the defendant's confession of the crime of this case, the defendant's primary crime, the father of the defendant's primary crime, and the defendant's father's desire to leave the defendant's wife against the defendant.