If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On August 29, 2017, around 14:00, the Defendant received 150,000 won as the price for sexual traffic and engaged in sexual traffic on a single-time basis from the Defendant, through the “E” in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “D Telecom” 206, a smartphone-rating c, and the Defendant received 150,000 won as the price for sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 21 (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective Commercial Sex Acts, concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 21 of the same Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The criminal liability of the defendant is not weak if the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order is that the defendant was sentenced to a punishment for the same kind of crime, and then recommitting the period of a repeated crime even though he was sentenced to a repeated crime.

However, the defendant's attempt to commit the crime of this case is against the mistake, and the defendant again does not commit such a crime.

The crime of this case shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the records of this case, including the circumstances after the crime, etc.