협박
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. Around June 8, 2014, around 16:30 on June 16, 2014, the Defendant threatened the victim by threatening the victim, on the ground that the Defendant did not agree on KRW 200,000 upon the Defendant’s Defendant’s residential intrusion case, which had been living in 408 neighboring 407, for several months, for the Defendant’s residential intrusion case, which had been living in 16:30, 201.
2. We examine the judgment. Since the facts charged of this case constitutes a crime falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, it cannot be prosecuted against the victim's explicit intent pursuant to Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim can be acknowledged the fact that he/she has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on July 28, 2014, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted, so the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act and is so decided as per Disposition.