If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On September 22, 2014, at around 03:20 on September 22, 2014, the Defendant obstructed the taxi business by bringing in the E-si operated by the victim D in front of the C-type store located in B, and demanding the victim to grow up to the house without money. However, the Defendant was rejected, and thus, the Defendant interfered with the taxi business by bringing the 20 minutes of 20 minutes of pact and preventing other customers from carrying.

2. Around 03:40 on September 22, 2014, the Defendant insultingd the victim by openly insulting the victim by 30 minutes of the victim H, who confirmed the process of interference with the business affairs under paragraph (1) above, among police officers belonging to the said taxi driver D and the said district group, in front of the G District and the G District located in F at the time of stay at around 03:40 on September 22, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D and H

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business by force), Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of insult) and the selection of each fine;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;