A Imprisonment with prison labor of six months and fines of ten million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

The Defendants are the defendants.

Defendant

A engages in the Do and retail business of dry water in the name of G from Mapopo City F, and Defendant B engages in the production business of dry water in the name of J in Jindo-gun, Jindo-gun.

No trader or distributor of goods, etc. shall make a false or misleading indication of origin.

Defendant

A purchased 2,745.5 km from L operated by K in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government J building A, 1421 on July 17, 2013. On March 14, 2014, he/she transported the franchisation to the NN workplace located in Jindo-gun M, Jindo-gun, and ordered Defendant B to subdivide it into the 1.5 km fake boxes indicating “Korea” on the front side, and Defendant B subdivided the franchisation into the 2,082 gbox as above, in accordance with the foregoing direction.

Defendant

A on March 19, 2014, among the destroyed values of Japan subdivided as above, sold 252 stuffs to Q in Gwangju Seo-gu through a consignment sales business operator P, and 919 stuffs are so small as to be "Japan" on the side of white Bera (7.5 cm x 6.5 cm) and evidence, such as investigation report (Seoul V V distribution process) on March 17, 2014 and March 24, 2014 (Evidence No. 95 of the Evidence Record) written in the indictment, are as follows: “The date on March 20, 2014 and March 25, 2014” does not affect the Defendant’s defense right ex officio, and thus, it appears that the Defendant’s right of defense is modified ex officio. < Amended by Act No. 12521, Mar. 17, 2014; Act No. 12521, Mar. 24, 2014>

The sum of 2,342,700,000 won was sold to V operated by U in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, and the remainder of 911 gambling was kept in the workplace for sale purposes.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to make a false indication of origin in the Japanese Norm 1,163 and made a false indication of origin in the 919 gambling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The defendant A's legal statement.